People v. TisdalePeople v. Tisdale
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly replaced two sworn jurors with alternate jurors (see,
Defendant contends that the court erred in allowing an officer to testify as an expert in the identification of drugs. The qualification of an expert is within the discretion of the court, and we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion here (see, People v Page,