People v. ThompsonPeople v. Thompson
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant‘s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see
The defendant‘s contention that his adjudication as a persistent violent felony offender violated his right to a jury trial is unpreserved for appellate review, and in any event, is without merit (see People v Rosen, 96 NY2d 329 [2001], cert denied 534 US 899 [2001]; see also People v Rivera, 5 NY3d 61, 67 [2005]).
The defendant‘s contentions raised in his supplemental pro se brief are without merit. Miller, J.P., Goldstein, Mastro and Dillon, JJ., concur.