People v. ThomasPeople v. Thomas
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him, following a jury trial, of assault in the second degree (
We reject defendant’s further contention that the court erred in allowing a witness to make an in-court identification of defendant in the absence of a
Contrary to defendant’s further contention, viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the crimes as charged to the jury (see People v Danielson,
The contention of defendant in his pro se supplemental brief concerning the alleged denial of effective assistance of counsel involves matters outside the record on appeal and thus is not reviewable on direct appeal (see People v Martina,