midpage

People v. ThomasPeople v. Thomas

California Supreme Court
Jun 7, 1883
Reporters:
,
Per Curiam.

The demurrer to the information should have been sustained. The information neither ‍‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​​​​‌​​‌​​​‌​​​​‌‍gives the legal appellation of any crime, nor states facts necessarily constituting a crime. “Attempting to suborn perjury” is not the generic *483name of any class ‍‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​​​​‌​​‌​​​‌​​​​‌‍of offenses. There is nothing stated to indicate that the act of defendant would have resulted in a subornation of a witness if it had not ‍‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​​​​‌​​‌​​​‌​​​​‌‍been frustrated by extraneous circumstances (1 Wharton’s Cr. L. 181); or that the testimony which defendant tried to have given was material to the issue; ‍‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​​​​‌​​‌​​​‌​​​​‌‍or that he did not believe it to be true, or, indeed, what was the testimony he asked any person to give.

Judgment and order reversed ‍‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​‌​​​‌​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​​​​‌​​‌​​​‌​​​​‌‍with direction to the court below to sustain the demurrer to the information.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Thomas
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 7, 1883
Citations: 63 Cal. 482; 1883 Cal. LEXIS 504
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
Log In