People v. TaylorPeople v. Taylor
Defendant was charged in an indictment with three counts of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree and three counts of petit larceny in connection with his possession and negotiation of three forged checks in the amounts of
Defendant‘s lone assertion here—that Supreme Court erred in imposing $1,295.36 in restitution without first conducting a hearing—is precluded by his valid waiver of appeal inasmuch as that amount was an explicit part of defendant‘s agreed-upon plea bargain (see People v Gilmour, 61 AD3d 1122, 1123-1124 [2009], lv denied 12 NY3d 925 [2009]; cf. People v McLean, 59 AD3d 859, 860-861 [2009]). In any event, contrary to defendant‘s contention, the court properly imposed restitution in the amount of all three forged checks given that defendant‘s guilty plea was in full satisfaction of the six-count indictment (see
Peters, J.P., Rose, Malone Jr. and Kavanagh, JJ., concur.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.