People v. TatePeople v. Tate
Defendant‘s sole contention on appeal is that her sentence should be reduced in the interest of justice. However, given her knowing, voluntary and intelligent guilty plea and waiver of the right to appeal reflected in County Court‘s careful plea colloquy, we will not review the severity of defendant‘s sentence (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255-256 [2006]; People v Clow, 10 AD3d 803, 804 [2004]).
Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Spain, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.