History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Tardbania
528 N.E.2d 507
NY
1988
Check Treatment

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The remarks made by the prosecutor on summation do not require reversal. In some instances where the defendant objected, the objection was sustained and adequate curative instructions were given and in other instances no objection was taken. Therefore, no issue has been preserved for review by this court (CPL 470.05 [2]).

We have not passed on the double jeopardy issue decided by the Appellate Division because the defendant has not argued the point on this appeal.

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Tardbania
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 30, 1988
Citation: 528 N.E.2d 507
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.