People v. SyrellPeople v. Syrell
Defendant‘s sole contention is that his sentence is harsh and excessive and should be reduced in light of recent legislation amending the Rockefeller drug laws. In view of defendant‘s knowing, voluntary and intelligent guilty plea and waiver of the right to appeal, we decline to review the severity of the sentence (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255-256 [2006]). We note, however, that in light of recent amendments to the Rockefeller drug laws as they pertain to sentences imposed upon class A-II felons, a defendant is not precluded by a waiver of the right to appeal from applying to County Court for resentencing under
Mercure, J.P., Peters, Spain, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.