People v. StraussPeople v. Strauss
- Reporters:
- , ,
We find no merit to defendant‘s sole claim that the sentence imposed was harsh and excessive. Defendant agreed to the sentence as part of the plea bargain and has a rather extensive criminal history, consisting mainly of theft-related crimes. Accordingly, we perceive no extraordinary circumstances or an abuse of discretion warranting a reduction of the sentence in the interest of justice (see People v Hill, 11 AD3d 817, 818 [2004]).
Crew III, J.P., Peters, Carpinello, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.