History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Stovall
13 N.Y.2d 1178
NY
1964
Check Treatment

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there were presented and necessarily passed upon questions under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Appellant contended (1) that his rights under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States were violated in that appellant was compelled to testify against himself after arraignment; and (2) that he was convicted on evidence obtained by unlawful search and seizure, in violation of his rights under the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, and that such unlawful search and seizure deprived him of his constitutional right to privacy under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. The Court of Appeals held that appellant’s constitutional rights had not been violated. [See 13 N Y 2d 1094.]

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Stovall
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 23, 1964
Citation: 13 N.Y.2d 1178
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.