| NY | Nov 24, 1948

Judgment affirmed. Upon this appeal the following question was presented and necessarily passed upon: The appellants contended that the receipt in evidence of wire tapped telephone calls was illegal because of section 605 of the Federal Communications Act of 1934 (U.S. Code, tit. 47, § 605). This court held to the contrary. (See Matter of Harlem Check Cashing Corp. v. Bell,296 N.Y. 15" court="NY" date_filed="1946-07-23" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/matter-of-harlem-check-cashing-corp-v-bell-3599067?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="3599067">296 N.Y. 15.) No opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE and FULD, JJ. *730

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.