People v. St. GelaisPeople v. St. Gelais
—Appeal by the
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s claim that he was promised a certain sentence upon his plea of guilty is dehors the record and thus not reviewable on direct appeal (see, People v Kinchen,
Since the defendant failed to move for dismissal of the indictment on constitutional speedy trial grounds, any claim of error with respect thereto is unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Bencosme,
The defendant was afforded meaningful representation of counsel (see, People v Baldi,
The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Bracken, J. P., Pizzuto, Altman and Krausman, JJ., concur.