People v. SpruellPeople v. Spruell
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The sentencing court conducted a sufficient inquiry to determine that the defendant violated a condition of the plea agreement which the court had imposed as a prerequisite to youthful offender status (see People v Valencia, 3 NY3d 714 [2004]; People v Covington, 28 AD3d 575 [2006]), and the court did not otherwise improvidently exercise its discretion in denying such status (see People v Stanley, 38 AD3d 923 [2007]; People v Taylor, 302 AD2d 480 [2003]). Prudenti, P.J., Ritter, Santucci and Covello, JJ., concur.