THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v RODNEY SPENCER, Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York
46 NYS3d 74
The court properly denied defendant‘s motion to suppress physical evidence, identification testimony and one of his statements to the police. An officer with extensive experience in narcotics arrests observed defendant, a known drug dealer, conduct a hand-to-hand exchange of an unidentified object in exchange for currency in a drug-prone location. The officer had also learned from an officer in an observation post that defendant had met with the buyer in a nearby park and directed the buyer to the parking garage where the sale was consummated.
Additionally, there is no basis for disturbing the credibility determinations of the hearing court, which are supported by the record (see People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759, 761 [1977]).
Concur—Friedman, J.P., Renwick, Saxe and Gische, JJ.
