History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Southerland
733 N.Y.S.2d 882
N.Y. App. Div.
2001
Check Treatment

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered March 29, 2000, convicting him of robbery in the third degree, criminal contempt in the first degree, and criminal mischief in the fourth degree, after a non-jury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the prosecution violated CPL 710.30 by not serving him with a list of its witnesses within 15 days after his arraignment is without merit. Since *498there was no police-arranged identification procedure, CPL 710.30 does not apply (see, People v Richardson, 212 AD2d 743; People v Kavanaugh, 207 AD2d 719).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Ritter, J. P., Krausman, Goldstein and S. Miller, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Southerland
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 26, 2001
Citation: 733 N.Y.S.2d 882
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In