History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Sooknanan
92 A.D.3d 810
N.Y. App. Div.
2012
Check Treatment

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v BOBBY SOOKNANAN, Appellant

[938 NYS2d 467]

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see

People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree. Moreover, upon our independent review pursuant to CPL 470.15 (5), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see
People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]
). Contrary to the defendant’s contention, his conduct was not consistent with innocent possession (see generally
People v Williams, 50 NY2d 1043, 1045 [1980]
; accord
People v Snyder, 73 NY2d 900, 902 [1989]
;
People v Hawkins, 258 AD2d 472 [1999]
;
People v Ortiz, 172 AD2d 696 [1991]
). Dillon, J.P, Florio, Chambers and Roman, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Sooknanan
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Feb 14, 2012
Citation: 92 A.D.3d 810
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.