97 N.Y.S. 469 | N.Y. App. Div. | 1906
The defendant was indicted for the crime of grand larceny committed on the 20th of February, 1905, in feloniously obtaining certain merchandise by false representations atid. personation.
It is urged that the false pretenses related to the ability of the defendant to pay, and that, therefore, under the provisions, of section 544 of the Penal Code, they must have been- in writing and signed ' in order to constitute a crime. The false representations, proved against the defendant did not relate to his means or ability to pay, but they were representations of an independent fact, that he was a member of a firm, one of the partners of which was his brother, and had a good financial standing and rating. Suclr false representation is of an independent fact not relating solely to financial ability, and it is not necessary that it should be in writing .and signed in order to be criminal. (People v. Rothstein, 180 N. Y. 148.)
It is also insisted that there is nó proof that the defendant intended tp defraud the owners of their property or appropriate h to his own use. The defendant must be presumed to have intended
"¡STo errors were committed upon the trial in the receipt or rejection of evidence, or iir the refusals to charge, which call for a reversal of the judgment and it must be affirmed.
O’Brien, P. J., Ingraham:, Laughlin and Clarke, JJ"., concurred.
; Judgment affirmed.