People v. Sneed, 191 A.D.2d 969

—Judgment unanimously modified as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice and as modified affirmed in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendant’s contention that his statement should have been suppressed based on a violation of Payton v New York (445 US 573) was not raised before the suppression court and is unpreserved for our review (see, People v Martin, 50 NY2d 1029). We decline to reach that issue in the interest of justice. We modify, however, to provide that all sentences run concurrently (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [b]). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Egan, J.— Attempted Rape, 1st Degree.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Pine, Lawton, Boomer and Davis, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Sneed

Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date Published: Mar 12, 1993

Citations: 191 A.D.2d 969; 595 N.Y.S.2d 341; 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2919

Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.