History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Snebold
191 Cal. App. 2d 514
Cal. Ct. App.
1961
Check Treatment
DUNIWAY, J.

Snebold appeals from an order denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. On October 1, 1958, he was convicted of a violation of Penal Code, section 4502, possession of a deadly weapon while a prisoner committed to a state prison. He says that on the date of his conviction he was told by an assistant warden, in substance, that the latter had planted the weapon, a knife, on him.

Newly discovered evidence is a ground for motion for a new trial (Pen. Code, §§ 1181, 1182). Under these circumstances, coram nobis is not available, “even though the facts upon which the application for the writ is based were not discovered until too late to present them upon a motion for new trial.” (People v. Cox, 18 Cal.App.2d 283, 286 [63 P.2d 849]; see also People v. Tuthill, 32 Cal.2d 819, 821-822 [198 P.2d 505]; People v. Blalock, 53 Cal.2d 798, 801 [349 P.2d 953].)

Affirmed.

Bray, P. J., and Tobriner, J., concurred.

Appellant’s petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied June 21, 1961.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Snebold
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Apr 25, 1961
Citation: 191 Cal. App. 2d 514
Docket Number: Crim. No. 3856
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.