People v. SmithPeople v. Smith
—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph Fisch, J., on CPL 190.50 [5] [c] motion; Megan Tallmer, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered May 2, 2000, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds, criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to three concurrent terms of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.
Even assuming the truth of defendant’s allegations concerning counsel’s failure to effectuate his request to testify before the grand jury, such failure does not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel warranting dismissal of the indictment (People v Wiggins,
Since defendant made only a generalized objection, his current challenge to a comment made by the prosecutor during summation is not preserved for review (People v Clarke,
Defendant’s claim that the procedure by which he was adjudicated a second felony offender did not satisfy the requirements of CPL 400.21 requires preservation (People v Oliver,
Defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them. Concur — Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Rosenberger and Friedman, JJ.