People v. SmithPeople v. Smith
We are unpersuaded by defendant‘s sole contention that his sentence is harsh and excessive. Notwithstanding, among other things, defendant‘s youth and his lack of a significant criminal record, there is no indication that County Court abused its discretion in imposing the sentence for this violent offense, nor are there any extraordinary circumstances that would warrant a modification thereof. Inasmuch as defendant agreed to the sentence under the negotiated plea bargain agreement, we find no reason to reduce the sentence imposed (see People v Miller, 29 AD3d 1033, 1033 [2006]; People v McCarthy, 23 AD3d 919, 919-920 [2005]).
Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Spain, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.