History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Simpson
66 A.D.2d 1008
N.Y. App. Div.
1978
Check Treatment

Case held, decision reserved and matter remitted to Monroe County Court, for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: The defendant was convicted of one count of robbery in the second degree (Penal Law, § 160.10, subd 1). Among other things, he contends that he was denied his right to a speedy trial in violation of CPL 30.30. The trial court, after hearing oral arguments, denied his motion for dismissal of the indictment without making findings concerning statutory periods of exclusion. As the trial court noted, this case involved numerous adjournments. Some of these periods of delay may be charged to the defendant. However, it is impossible to determine such periods of delay from this record. On remand the trial court should conduct a hearing and make appropriate findings in accordance with CPL 30.30 (subd 4). At the hearing it will be incumbent upon the prosecution to establish statutory periods of exclusion which justify the delay (People v Del *1009Valle, 63 AD2d 830). We have considered the other issues raised by the defendant and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment: of Monroe County Court—robbery, second degree, and grand larceny, third degree.) Present—Marsh, P. J., Cardamone, Dillon, Schnepp and Witmer, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Simpson
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 15, 1978
Citation: 66 A.D.2d 1008
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.