People v. SimmonsPeople v. Simmons
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the People‘s contention, the defendant did not validly waive his right to appeal (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]). However, contrary to the defendant‘s contention, the hearing court properly denied that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence. The People established that the police lawfully approached the vehicle in which the defendant was a passenger, and asked the driver of the vehicle for his license and registration, after the vehicle swerved into the testifying police officer‘s lane of traffic, almost striking his vehicle (see People v Reid, 104 AD3d 58 [2013]; People v Peterson, 22 AD3d 770, 771 [2005]; People v Hoffman, 135 AD2d 299, 301 [1988];
With respect to the defendant‘s request for a document pursuant to