History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Sherman
45 Misc. 2d 92
N.Y. App. Term.
1964
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Defendant’s plea of guilty to the charge of violating section 4 of the Explosive Ordinance of the Town of North Hempstead (unlawful discharge of a firearm) barred, upon the ground of double jeopardy, a subsequent prosecution for the same offense under subdivision 4 of section 1904 of the Penal Law. (People v. Chessman, 13 N Y 2d 793; People ex rel. Ostwald v. Craver, 272 App. Div. 181; People ex rel. Hunt v. McDonnell, 201 Misc. 406, affd. 279 App. Div. 923; see, also, Code Crim. Pro., § 673.)

The judgment of conviction should be unanimously reversed on the law and complaint dismissed.

Concur — Di Giovanna, Benjamin and Hargett, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Sherman
Court Name: Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Date Published: Dec 9, 1964
Citation: 45 Misc. 2d 92
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Term.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.