History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Shapiro
61 N.Y.2d 880
NY
1984
Check Treatment

*882OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Term should be affirmed.

In view of the fact that the village constabulary was not lawfully constituted (County of Nassau v Incorporated Vil. of Woodsburgh, 58 NY2d 996), the constable in this case had no authority to issue a uniform traffic information (CPL 100.10, subd 2, par [a]). Although an ordinary information may be filed by any person (CPL 100.10, subd 1), the instrument may not serve that function in this case because it did not contain, as the statute requires, “a statement of the complainant alleging facts of an evidentiary character supporting or tending to support the charges” (CPL 100.15, subd 3).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Kaye concur; Judge Simons taking no part.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Shapiro
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 28, 1984
Citation: 61 N.Y.2d 880
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.