People v. SeabrooksPeople v. Seabrooks
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant shot the victim three times in the chest, at close range, with a .38 caliber revolver. The defendant contends that the Supreme Court erred in denying his request to charge manslaughter in the first degree (
Viewed in the light most favorable to the defendant, the evidence does not support this contention (see People v Moreno, 16 AD3d 438 [2005]; People v Maldonado, 5 AD3d 505, 506 [2004]; People v Wheeler, 257 AD2d 673 [1999]; People v Holmes, 196 AD2d 555 [1993], lv denied 82 NY2d 755 [1993], cert denied 510 US 1128 [1994]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly refused to submit manslaughter in the first degree as a lesser-included offense of intentional murder.
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Crane, J.P., Goldstein, Luciano and Covello, JJ., concur.