midpage

People v. ScottPeople v. Scott

New York Court of Appeals
Sep 2, 1993
Versions:82 N.Y.2d 729
621 N.E.2d 689
602 N.Y.S.2d 322
1993 N.Y. LEXIS 3010

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The suppression court’s undisturbed finding that defendant *731abandoned the bag when he "flew out” of the livery cab is supported by the record and thus beyond further review by this Court (see, People v Hollman, 79 NY2d 181, 193-194; People v Harrison, 57 NY2d 470, 478). The record supports the hearing court’s inference that when defendant exited the cab in an abrupt manner and without ever having been directed to do so by the police, he would have run away had one of the police officers not blocked his path.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed in a memorandum.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa and Smith concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Scott
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Sep 2, 1993
Citations: 82 N.Y.2d 729; 621 N.E.2d 689; 602 N.Y.S.2d 322; 1993 N.Y. LEXIS 3010
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In