People v. ScarpettaPeople v. Scarpetta
—Judgment of the Supreme
Defendant’s sentences were predicated upon defendant’s presumed status as an armed felony offender. Robbery in the first degree is considered a violent felony offense (Penal Law § 70.02 [1] [a]) and a defendant convicted of that crime must be sentenced to an indeterminate prison term, the minimum of which must be one third the maximum (Penal Law § 70.02, [4]). A minimum term of imprisonment equal to one half the maximum may be imposed if the robbery is an armed felony offense (Penal Law § 70.02 [4]). An armed felony is defined by CPL 1.20 (41) as a crime involving:
"(a) possession, being armed with or causing serious physical injury by means of a deadly weapon, if the weapon is a loaded weapon from which a shot, readily capable of producing death or other serious physical injury, may be discharged; or
"(b) display of what appears to be a pistol, revolver, rifle, shotgun, machine gun or other firearm.”
Thus, a felony committed with a weapon other than a firearm is not an armed felony. Defendant’s robbery offenses each involved the use of a knife but no firearm. Consequently, the sentencing of defendant as an armed felony offender was illegal and we vacate and remand. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Asch, Fein, Kassal and Ellerin, JJ.