People v. SavagePeople v. Savage
Defendant‘s sole contention is that the sentence imposed is harsh and excessive. Based upon our review of the record, we disagree. Defendant was given a favorable plea bargain enabling her to avoid exposure to prison, but admittedly failed to abide by the conditions of her probation. In view of this, and given that defendant could have received a greater prison term, we find no extraordinary circumstances nor any abuse of discretion warranting a reduction of the sentence in the interest of justice (see People v Feliciano, 54 AD3d 1131, 1132-1133 [2008]).
Peters, J.P., Malone Jr., Kavanagh, Garry and Egan Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.