People v. SaundersPeople v. Saunders
The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]; see also People v Rayam, 94 NY2d 557 [2000]). The evidence supports the conclusion that defendant acted intentionally as to one victim but recklessly as to the other.
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Friedman and Acosta, JJ.