midpage

People v. SatiroPeople v. Satiro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Apr 4, 2006
Reporters:
,

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic.

Due to the defendant‘s failure to appeal from the underlying judgment and sentence, his challenge to the underlying plea allocution and sentence is jurisdictionally foreclosed (see People v Riddick, 269 AD2d 472 [2000]; People v Moore, 261 AD2d 421 [1999]; People v McMillan, 228 AD2d 166 [1996]; People v Serrano, 203 AD2d 395 [1994]).

The completion of the defendant‘s term of probation in July 2005 rendered his challenge to the re-imposition and extension of the term of his sentence of probation academic (see People v Patacchiola, 290 AD2d 568 [2002]; People v Griffin, 239 AD2d 936 [1997]; People v Coleman, 179 AD2d 670 [1992]). Schmidt, J.P., Krausman, Mastro and Lunn, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Satiro
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Apr 4, 2006
Citations: 28 A.D.3d 497; 811 N.Y.S.2d 589
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In