People v. SatiroPeople v. Satiro
- Reporters:
- ,
Due to the defendant‘s failure to appeal from the underlying judgment and sentence, his challenge to the underlying plea allocution and sentence is jurisdictionally foreclosed (see People v Riddick, 269 AD2d 472 [2000]; People v Moore, 261 AD2d 421 [1999]; People v McMillan, 228 AD2d 166 [1996]; People v Serrano, 203 AD2d 395 [1994]).
The completion of the defendant‘s term of probation in July 2005 rendered his challenge to the re-imposition and extension of the term of his sentence of probation academic (see People v Patacchiola, 290 AD2d 568 [2002]; People v Griffin, 239 AD2d 936 [1997]; People v Coleman, 179 AD2d 670 [1992]). Schmidt, J.P., Krausman, Mastro and Lunn, JJ., concur.