People v. Santos

Oct 31, 1995
Versions:86 N.Y.2d 869
658 N.E.2d 1041
635 N.Y.S.2d 168
1995 N.Y. LEXIS 3567

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The issue presented on appeal is whether a defendant’s general motion to dismiss for insufficiency after the People have rested in a Bench trial raises a question of law. This Court has held that a specific objection is required to preserve sufficiency of the evidence claims for appellate review in jury trials (People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10; see, People v Bynum, 70 NY2d 858). There is no material difference between jury and nonjury trials in this respect and no practical reason why the Gray-Bynum rule should not apply to both Bench and jury trials. To the extent our holding conflicts with People v Nixon (248 NY 182), that decision is overruled.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed in a memorandum.