People v. Santilli, 16 A.D.3d 1056

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting her of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree (Penal Law § 220.18 [2]), defendant contends that the sentence of incarceration of 3¹/₂ years to life constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. We conclude that the contention of defendant does not survive her valid waiver of the right to appeal (see People v Hidalgo, 283 AD2d 154 [2001], lv denied 96 NY2d 902 [2001]; People v Brathwaite, 263 AD2d 89, 92 [2000]) and, in any event, that contention is not preserved for our review (see People v Ingram, 67 NY2d 897, 899 [1986]; People v Cato, 291 AD2d 905 [2002], lv denied 98 NY2d 649 [2002]).

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Santilli

Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date Published: Mar 18, 2005

Citations: 16 A.D.3d 1056; 790 N.Y.S.2d 898; 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2801

Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.