The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Caesar Santiago, Appellant.
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York
908 NYS2d 345
The court properly denied defendant‘s motion to suppress his statement. The hearing evidence establishes that the officer‘s question, “What happened?” at the scene of an assault did not constitute custodial interrogation requiring Miranda warnings (see People v Taylor, 57 AD3d 327 [2008], lv denied 12 NY3d 860 [2009]).
Defendant‘s remaining contentions are unavailing (see People v Correa, 15 NY3d 213 [2010]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Richter and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
