History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Santiago
812 N.Y.S.2d 358
N.Y. App. Div.
2006
Check Treatment

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v DIXON SANTIAGO, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York

812 N.Y.S.2d 358

Adams, J.P., Goldstein, Fisher and Lifson, JJ.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered November 4, 2002, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence imposed; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Orange County, for resentencing.

Based on the information in the predicate felony statement (see CPL 400.21 [2]), the County Court erred in adjudicating the defendant a second felony offender (see

People v Stanley, 12 AD3d 467 [2004]). As the People concede, the incarceration dates set forth in the predicate felony statement did not amount to a sufficient tolling period to qualify the defendant’s 1987 conviction as a predicate felony under Penal Law § 70.06 (1) (b) (iv) and (v). Accordingly, the sentence must be vacated and the matter remitted to the County Court, Orange County, for resentencing. Adams, J.P., Goldstein, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Santiago
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Apr 11, 2006
Citation: 812 N.Y.S.2d 358
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.