47 A.D.3d 1012
N.Y. App. Div.
2008
Start with the first whole opinion. The first page (1012) contains the end of a previous case and then the start of “The People of the State of New York v. Kyle Frederick Sander“. I will skip the partial case at the top and focus on the Sander case. Case name: The People of the State of New York v. Kyle Frederick Sander Short name: People v. Sander Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department (Inferred from judge names Mercure, Peters, Spain, Lahtinen which are AD3 judges, and the citation format). Citation: 850 N.Y.S.2d 238 (Note: the OCR says 850NYS2d238, I will format it correctly). Docket: Not explicitly provided in the header, but usually there‘s one. None found in snippet. Date: July 27, 2006 (Rendered date of judgment being appealed), but the decision date isn‘t explicitly on the header. However, based on the context of the snippet, I‘ll extract what‘s there. Wait, looking at the layout: “The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kyle Frederick Sander, Appellant. [850 NYS2d 238]” is the caption for the second case. The judge name “Spain, J.” starts the opinion. The rendered date of the judgment being appealed is July 27, 2006. Let‘s look at the reporter page numbers. 1012 and 1013. Text cleaning: “Del- aware” -> “Delaware” “chil- dren” -> “children” “viola- tion” -> “violation” “partici- pation” -> “participation” “require- ment” -> “requirement” “de- termination” -> “determination” “or- der” -> “order” “ap- pealed” -> “appealed” “V-/sto” in OCR is clearly “1 1/3 to” (1 1/3 to 4 years) based on the context of NY sentencing. Looking at the image, it is “1 1/3 to 4 years“. “lVs” in OCR is also “1 1/3“. Case Citations: - People v Henkel, 37 AD3d 873, 873 [2007] - People v Walts, 34 AD3d 1043, 1044 [2006] - People v Johnston, 32 AD3d 556, 556 [2006] - People v Kuey, 83 NY2d 278, 282 [1994] Law Citations: - CPL 470.05 [2] (N.Y. Crim. Proc. Law § 470.05) - US Constitution, Establishment Clause Let‘s begin. Case Info attributes: shortName=“People v. Sander” court=“N.Y. App. Div.” (Third Dept is implied by judges, but N.Y. App. Div. is standard Bluebook) date=“2007” (The volume 850 N.Y.S.2d corresponds to 2007/2008. The judgment being appealed is 2006. Based on NY official reports, cases with these judges in that volume are 2007 or 2008. I will look for a date in the text. I don‘t see the specific decision date, so I will use the year from the parallel citation if known, or omit if not provided in text. Actually, standard practice for these tasks is to use what‘s on the page. No specific decision date is on these pages.) Wait, page 1012 shows the end of a previous case and the start of the next. I will start the Sander case. First page marker is 1012. Sander case starts near bottom of 1012. One correction: The OCR for the citation [850NYS2d238] is likely a parallel citation. Pagination: 1012, 1013. The text “The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kyle Frederick Sander, Appellant. [850 NYS2d 238]” is the caption. Then “Spain, J.” starts the opinion. Let‘s identify law citations: - CPL 470.05 [2] -> CPL 470.05 [2] - US Constitution -> US Constitution Case citations: - People v Iannelli, 69 NY2d 684 [1986] - cert denied 482 US 914 [1987] - People v Henkel, 37 AD3d 873 [2007] - People v Walts, 34 AD3d 1043 [2006] - People v Johnston, 32 AD3d 556 [2006] - People v Kuey, 83 NY2d 278 [1994] Let‘s check the citation sequence in the last big paragraph: “see People v Henkel, 37 AD3d 873, 873 [2007], lv denied 8 NY3d 985 [2007]; People v Walts, 34 AD3d 1043, 1044 [2006], lv denied 8 NY3d 850 [2007]; People v Johnston, 32 AD3d 556, 556 [2006]” The OCR got the order of “8 NY3d 850 [2007]; v People Johnston” wrong. Image shows: “lv denied 8 NY3d 850 [2007]; People v Johnston, 32 AD3d 556, 556 [2006]“. Sentencing: “1 1/3 to 4 years“. The OCR says “V-/sto” or “lVs“. I will use the text from the image: “1 1/3 to 4 years“. Let‘s build the HTML. The text starts with Judge Spain‘s statement about the appeal. Case Info Header: Case Name: The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kyle Frederick Sander, Appellant. Citation: 850 N.Y.S.2d 238 Court: New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Body starts at midpage-ps 1012. Paragraph 1: “Spain, J. Appeal from a judgment...” Paragraph 2: “In May 2003, defendant...” Paragraph 3 (Page 1013): “In January 2005, defendant...” Paragraph 4: “We affirm. Defendant initially...” Paragraph 5: “Additionally, inasmuch as...” Signature block: Cardona, P.J., Peters, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. Note: The snippet on page 1012 includes the end of a prior case. I must skip it as per instructions (“Skip partial content from a previous case“). The first full case on the page is People v. Sander. Final check of citations: People v Iannelli, 69 NY2d 684 [1986], cert denied 482 US 914 [1987] People v Henkel, 37 AD3d 873 [2007] People v Walts, 34 AD3d 1043 [2006] People v Johnston, 32 AD3d 556 [2006] People v Kuey, 83 NY2d 278 [1994] Law citations: CPL 470.05 [2] US Constitution Let‘s verify the judge‘s title/listing. “Spain, J.” “Cardona, P.J., Peters, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur.” “Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.” Ready. One detail: “1 1/3” is often rendered as 1 1/3. I will use the fraction symbol if it looks like one, or text. In the image, it looks like a single character fraction or small superscripts. I‘ll use “1 1/3“. “lVs” in OCR is “1 1/3“. Wait, look at “8 NY3d 850 [2007]; v People Johnston“. Actually, it‘s: (see People v Henkel, 37 AD3d 873, 873 [2007], lv denied 8 NY3d 985 [2007]; People v Walts, 34 AD3d 1043, 1044 [2006], lv denied 8 NY3d 850 [2007]; People v Johnston, 32 AD3d 556, 556 [2006]). Double check: “v Johnston” - OCR says “v” before Johnston, but image shows “People v Johnston“. The OCR “People Johnston, 32 AD3d 556, 556 [2006]). 8 NY3d 850 [2007]; v” is scrambled. Correct sequence from image: ...lv denied 8 NY3d 985 [2007]; People v Walts, 34 AD3d 1043, 1044 [2006], lv denied 8 NY3d 850 [2007]; People v Johnston, 32 AD3d 556, 556 [2006]). The “8 NY3d 850” is the “lv denied” for People v Walts. Final review of the first paragraph on page 1013: “...agreeing, among other things, to participate in any additional recommended treatment and provide verification of his participation upon request.” OK. One more thing: The first line of the second case is “The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kyle Frederick Sander, Appellant. [850 NYS2d 238]“. I‘ll put the citation in the header. Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department. Abbr: N.Y. App. Div. Let‘s go.