midpage

People v. SamuelsPeople v. Samuels

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Feb 16, 2000
Versions:269 A.D.2d 859
703 N.Y.S.2d 768
2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1819

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that County Court impermissibly penalized him for exercising his right to go to trial. “The imposition of a more severe sentence after trial than that offered to defendant pursuant to a plea offer that he rejected, without more, does not support the contention of defendant that he was penalized for exercising his right to go to trial” (People v Jones, 229 AD2d 980, lv denied 89 NY2d 925). (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Harvey, J. — Criminal Possession Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present — Green, A. P. J., Wisner, Pigott, Jr., Hurlbutt and Scudder, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Samuels
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Feb 16, 2000
Citations: 269 A.D.2d 859; 703 N.Y.S.2d 768; 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1819
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In