People v. SaccoPeople v. Sacco
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Reichbach, J.), rendered November 27, 2000, convicting him of conspiracy in the fifth degree, criminal possession of stolen
Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the sentence imposed thereon; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for resentencing in accordance with
The defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel involves matters outside the record and is therefore not properly presented on direct appeal (see People v Bennett,
The Supreme Court failed to pronounce a clear sentence on each of the counts of which the defendant was convicted. Therefore, the matter must be remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for resentencing in accordance with
The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review, and in any event, are without merit. Ritter, J.P., Feuerstein, Goldstein and Cozier, JJ., concur.