People v. SabouniPeople v. Sabouni
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court‘s determinations concerning credibility. There was a chain of circumstantial evidence supporting the conclusion that defendant used a check routing number and bank account number of her former union to steal money from the union and use that money to pay her bills, and undermining the defense theory that defendant‘s teenaged son was solely responsible. Among other things, there was evidence of a pattern of conduct by defendant with no rational explanation except that she was a participant in the scheme.
We perceive no basis to disturb the amount of restitution ordered by the court.
Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Nardelli, Buckley, Acosta and DeGrasse, JJ.