History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Rullo
31 N.Y.2d 894
NY
1972
Check Treatment

Order affirmed in the following memorandum: Although it was error to receive in evidence during the People’s case-in-chief that portion of defendant’s Grand Jury testimony in which he acknowledged a prior conviction, such portion of the transcript of his Grand Jury testimony could have been redacted, and the error avoided, had defense counsel brought this matter to the attention of the trial court by means of a specific objection. The absence of a specific objection to the introduction of the prior conviction prevents this court from reviewing the issue. (People v. McCormick, 31 N Y 2d 807; cf. People v. Berrios, 28 N Y 2d 361, 367.)

Concur: Chief Judge Fuid and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergant, Bbeitel, Jasen and Gibson.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Rullo
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 28, 1972
Citation: 31 N.Y.2d 894
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.