People v. RosarioPeople v. Rosario
Defendant‘s claim that counsel was ineffective for not persuading him to plead guilty and, instead, pursuing an insanity defense is not reviewable on direct appeal as it is based on matters outside the record (see People v Rivera, 71 NY2d 705, 709 [1988]; People v Love, 57 NY2d 998 [1982]). On the existing record, to the extent it permits review, we find that defendant received effective assistance under the state and federal standards (see People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 713-714 [1998]; see also Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668 [1984]).
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Gonzalez and McGuire, JJ.