History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Romano
4 N.Y.2d 923
NY
1958
Check Treatment

Application to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States as follows: Appellant contended that on his petition for a writ of error coram nobis the Judge of the County Court, Kings County, did not conduct a fair and impartial hearing, and had intimidated the witnesses for appellant in violation of appellant’s rights under the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court of Appeals held that the rights of appellant had not been violated under the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. [See 4 N Y 2d 757.]

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Romano
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 8, 1958
Citation: 4 N.Y.2d 923
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.