People v. RogersPeople v. Rogers
The court properly denied defendant’s suppression motion. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determinations, which are supported by the record (see People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759, 761 [1977]). The arresting officer’s testimony that defendant was the only person on one side of a particular block at a particular moment was not implausible. In any event, in this case probable cause does not turn on whether defendant was literally the only person present, or instead was
Concur—Tom, J.P., Friedman, Sweeny, Nardelli and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.