People v. Rodriguez

May 20, 2008
Versions:51 A.D.3d 950
860 N.Y.S.2d 541

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed. No opinion. Prudenti, P.J., Skelos, Florio, Carni and Leventhal, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant‘s contention that the Supreme Court‘s Sandoval ruling (see People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371 [1974]) deprived him of a fair trial is without merit. The court properly weighed the probative value of the defendant‘s prior offenses on the issue of his credibility against the possible prejudice to him, and reached an appropriate compromise ruling (see People v Fotiou, 39 AD3d 877 [2007]; People v Lopez, 37 AD3d 496 [2007]; People v McLaurin, 33 AD3d 819, 820 [2006]; People v Singletary, 116 AD2d 604 [1986]).

The defendant‘s contention that the persistent violent felony offender sentencing scheme under Penal Law § 70.08 violates the principles announced in Apprendi v New Jersey (530 US 466 [2000]) is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Smith, 238 AD2d 451, 452 [1997]), and in any event, is without merit (see People v Leon, 10 NY3d 122 [2008]; People v Rivera, 5 NY3d 61 [2005], cert denied 546 US 984 [2005]; People v Rosen, 96 NY2d 329 [2001], cert denied 534 US 899 [2001]). Florio, J.P., Miller, Dillon and McCarthy, JJ., concur.