midpage

People v. RodriguezPeople v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Nov 20, 2007
Versions:45 A.D.3d 786
844 N.Y.S.2d 902

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The record does not reflect that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248 [2006]; People v Hurd, 44 AD3d 791 [2007]; cf. People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737 [2006]). We find that the hearing court properly denied that branch of the defendant‘s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence (see People v Gray, 35 AD3d 629 [2006]). Furthermore, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Miller, J.P., Crane, Ritter and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Rodriguez
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 20, 2007
Citations: 45 A.D.3d 786; 844 N.Y.S.2d 902
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In