People v. Rodriguez, 21 N.Y.3d 1030

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

Defendant failed to preserve his claim that he did not receive 20 days’ notice prior to his sex offender designation proceeding as required under Correction Law § 168-n (3). His argument that an adjournment of unspecified duration was required as a matter of due process is similarly unreviewable.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Rodriguez

Court Name: New York Court of Appeals

Date Published: Aug 27, 2013

Citations: 21 N.Y.3d 1030; 995 N.E.2d 178

Court Abbreviation: N.Y.