36 Mich. App. 132 | Mich. Ct. App. | 1971
After a jury trial the defendant was convicted of accepting the earnings of a prostitute without consideration. MCLA § 750.457 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev §28.712). He now appeals raising several issues.
Standing alone the refusal to give the instruction might be considered reversible error. However, the jury instructions must be read as a whole, People v. Dye (1959), 356 Mich 271, and a refusal to give an instruction is not reversible error when the substance of the instruction has been given in another portion of the charge. People v. Fred W. Thomas (1967), 7 Mich App 519. On numerous occasions the trial court informed the jury that to find guilt they must find that the defendant intended to make a profit. A reading of the instruction as a whole indicates that the jury was informed that if the defendant was merely holding the prostitute’s money with the intent to return any funds that were not spent on her the defendant was not guilty.
The defendant’s second contention is that the trial court erred by repeating certain portions of the statute and over-emphasizing certain portions of the prosecution’s case. The record does not support defendant’s contention. As has already been stated,
The defendant’s final issue was not raised at the trial level and in the absence of a miscarriage of justice will not be reviewed on appeal. People v. Larry Smith (1971), 31 Mich App 191; People v. Wright (1970), 23 Mich App 330.
Affirmed.