People v. RobertsonPeople v. Robertson
The court properly denied defendant‘s suppression motion. There is no basis for disturbing the court‘s credibility determinations. The police had information, provided by identified citizen-witnesses speaking from personal knowledge, that defendant had threatened to shoot one of the witnesses and had conveyed, at least by words and gestures, that he had a firearm. Accordingly, the police had probable cause to arrest defendant for menacing. The totality of the information in their posses
Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Mazzarelli, Acosta and Renwick, JJ.