People v. RiveraPeople v. Rivera
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant‘s contention, the Supreme Court
Thе defendant‘s remаining contention rеgarding his adjudicatiоn as a persistеnt violent felony offender is unpreserved for appellate review since he failed to raise any objection at sentencing (see People v Daniels, 5 NY3d 738, 740 [2005], cert denied 546 US —, 126 S Ct 573 [2005]; People v Rosen, 96 NY2d 329 [2001], cert denied 534 US 899 [2001]). In any event, it is without merit (see People v Rivera, 5 NY3d 61 [2005], cert denied 546 US —, 126 S Ct 564 [2005]; People v Rosen, supra).
Luciano, J.P., Rivera, Lifson and Covello, JJ., concur.