midpage

People v. RickettPeople v. Rickett

New York Court of Appeals
Apr 4, 2000
Versions:94 N.Y.2d 929
729 N.E.2d 1148
708 N.Y.S.2d 349
2000 N.Y. LEXIS 509

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The trial court did not err as a matter of law in denying defendant’s request to charge criminal trespass in the second degree as a lesser-included offense of burglary in the second degree (see, Penal Law §§ 140.15, 140.25). Although criminal trespass in the second degree is a lesser-included offense of burglary in the second degree, there is no reasonable view of the evidence to support a finding that defendant committed the lesser offense but not the greater (see, People v Scarborough, 49 NY2d 364, 368). Defendant’s remaining arguments are unpreserved.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Rickett
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 4, 2000
Citations: 94 N.Y.2d 929; 729 N.E.2d 1148; 708 N.Y.S.2d 349; 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 509
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In